CSP CSP.GG

MIBR vs Alliance

FISSURE Playground #3 (Playoffs) · Quarterfinal

2026-09-11 09:00 UTC+3 · BO3
finished

MIBR

2 : 0 2026-09-11 09:00 UTC+3

Alliance

FISSURE Playground #3 (Playoffs) BO3 2026-09-11 09:00 UTC+3 updated 2026-09-11 11:08 UTC+3
MIBR LWWLW
Alliance WWLWL

Pre-match model

Predictions

Winner

locked
MIBR 55.3%
Model pick MIBR medium
Alliance 44.7%

Total maps

locked
Line Probability over
2.5 56.5%

Map round totals

experiment
Round totals · Map 1 default-inferno
19.5 67.7%
20.5 50.8%
21.5 40.5%
Round totals · Map 2 default-cache
19.5 67.0%
20.5 58.4%
21.5 46.5%
Round totals · Map 3 ancient
19.5 67.1%
20.5 55.9%
21.5 45.5%
Round/map totals are experimental until promotion gates pass.

User vs CSP

Who do you pick?

My accuracy →

Pick anonymously — Telegram sign-in is optional.

Sign in with Telegram to share one pick between the site and the bot.

Prematch features

Why does CSP choose this team?

MIBR получает преимущество по данным: HLTV rank.

FactorMIBRAllianceSignal
CSP Power 1547 1658 opposes
Последние 10 матчей 50.0% 50.0% neutral
Map pool 57.8% 81.0% opposes
Стабильность состава 100.0% 100.0% neutral
HLTV rank #28 #50 supports

Signals come from the frozen prematch feature snapshot; they are comparisons, not invented causal contributions.

Most likely series scenarioMIBR 2:1 Alliance
Experimental total-maps model

Series format: BO3

Maps

Map 1 finished
default-inferno pick: Alliance
13:4
Map 2 finished
default-cache pick: MIBR
13:9
Map 3 To be played
ancient
–:–
Team form and performanceLoad section

Open to load current data.

Player statistics / LineupsLoad section

Open to load current data.

Head to headLoad section

Open to load current data.

Map vetoLoad section

Open to load current data.

Round historyLoad section

Open to load current data.